NSW Work Injury Claim

NSW workers compensation blog

Section 60 medical expenses NSW: what insurers should fund (and what to do when they refuse)

Section 60 disputes are rarely about the headline law. They are usually about whether your evidence proves treatment is reasonably necessary now, clinically linked to your work injury, and urgent enough to justify immediate approval.

Treatment request papers, clinical notes, scan results, and insurer correspondence prepared for review.

Quick answer: what section 60 means in practice

Section 60 usually requires the insurer to pay for reasonably necessary treatment linked to your work injury. Most disputes are won or lost on evidence quality: whether your treating team clearly explains necessity, causation, and what happens if care is delayed. In the early triage stage after a refusal, secure the written notice, your current Certificate of Capacity, and a treating-doctor update that directly answers the insurer's stated reasons.

What section 60 usually covers

  • GP and specialist consultations
  • Physiotherapy, psychology, and allied health treatment plans
  • Scans, diagnostics, medicines, and some equipment
  • Hospital treatment and surgery where clinically justified
  • Travel costs for approved treatment in eligible circumstances

If you are already dealing with a refusal, start with the dedicated guides for treatment denials and surgery denials. If the insurer says your treatment window has expired, review section 59A time limits.

Why insurers refuse section 60 requests

  1. The insurer argues treatment is not reasonably necessary right now.
  2. The clinical notes do not clearly connect treatment to work injury causation.
  3. Reports are old, generic, or inconsistent across providers.
  4. An IME report is given more weight than your treating practitioner evidence.
  5. The insurer says there is a better or cheaper treatment pathway.

If an IME report is driving the refusal, compare the refusal with SIRA guidance, the insurer's written reasons, and the Personal Injury Commission pathway before the narrative hardens. Use this IME response strategy before the narrative hardens.

Early triage stage after a refusal: practical plan

The early triage stage should be used to lock down the refusal reason, update the clinical evidence, and decide whether the dispute needs insurer reconsideration, a section 78 response, or Personal Injury Commission escalation.

TimingActionEvidence target
Early triage stageRequest written reasons and preserve the denial notice.Identify whether refusal is about causation, necessity, timing, or missing documents.
Day 2-3Ask the treating doctor for an updated report.Address section 60 necessity, work-injury connection, urgency, and functional risk if delayed.
Day 3-5Attach imaging, specialist letters, treatment history, and response-to-treatment notes.Show objective support instead of relying on bare assertion.
Day 5-7Choose reconsideration, section 78 response, section 59A route, or PIC escalation.Keep one decision path and one indexed document bundle.

If the refusal sits alongside payment pressure or liability disputes, map your options using claim denied steps, section 78 notice strategy, and the PIC disputes guide.

Evidence checklist that improves approval odds

  • Current certificate of capacity aligned to the proposed treatment
  • Provider letter explaining why this treatment is reasonably necessary now
  • Clear causation statement linking current symptoms to the accepted injury
  • Prior treatment outcomes (what worked, what failed, what remains impaired)
  • Functional impact detail: work tasks, daily activities, and risk if care is delayed

Use one indexed treatment-request pack to control insurer delay

A single indexed treatment-request pack is the safest way to answer repeated “more information” requests because it links each attachment to the insurer's stated refusal reason and creates a clean escalation record.

  • Part 1: Cover note that quotes each insurer question and answers it line-by-line.
  • Part 2: Current Certificate of Capacity and treating report focused on necessity, causation, and urgency.
  • Part 3: Objective support bundle (imaging, specialist letters, treatment history, and functional impact summary).
  • Part 4: Index table listing each attachment, date, and what refusal reason it addresses.
  • Part 5: Written request for a decision date and confirmation of the responsible claims team.

Keep all follow-up in one email thread and preserve subject-line continuity. If escalation becomes necessary, that record makes delay patterns easy to prove.

Which guide to open first: refusal route map

If more than one path applies, structure your file around one timeline and one supporting documents so each pathway reuses the same facts cleanly.