Overview
Sexual assault or harassment at work
Sexual assault and sexual harassment at work require careful, trauma-informed handling. Sexual assault may also involve violence or indictable conduct, while sexual harassment is a relevant-conduct category under the post-1 July 2026 psychological-injury rules.
General information only. It is not legal advice for your individual matter, and past outcomes do not guarantee future results.
How this accident commonly happens
Sexual assault or harassment at work can occur through unwelcome sexual advance, request or other unwelcome sexual conduct and sexual assault, coercion, stalking or threat. The incident history should identify the task, equipment, location and sequence of events rather than relying on the job title alone.
Repeated sexual comments, messages, images or conduct connected with work.
People commonly exposed
People commonly exposed include workers subjected to conduct by colleagues, supervisors, clients or members of the public and workers at ordinary workplaces, off-site duties, work travel or work functions. Employment records should identify each person's task, employer and position in the work area when the incident occurred.
Workers receiving sexualised messages through work systems.
Common injuries from this accident type
Medical records after a sexual assault or harassment at work may identify physical injury where assault occurred and a diagnosed primary psychological injury. Each diagnosis should be linked to the event or exposure and to the worker's actual functional change.
Secondary psychological symptoms following a physical injury.
Immediate reporting and safety records
After a sexual assault or harassment at work, immediate reporting and safety records may include confidential workplace report made through a safe channel where possible and police event number where an assault or crime is reported. These records can establish what was known at the time without requiring the worker to repeatedly recount a traumatic event.
- Preservation of messages, emails, access, CCTV and event records.
- Support-person, witness and contemporaneous disclosure records.
Evidence that may help
For a sexual assault or harassment at work, the first evidence to preserve includes chronology using the worker’s own words without unnecessary repetition of traumatic detail and work function, travel, roster or supervision records. It is most useful when dates, people, equipment, duties and later medical histories tell a consistent account.
- Prior complaints and employer response where relevant.
- Medical and psychological evidence.
Medical and psychological evidence
Medical and psychological evidence after a sexual assault or harassment at work may include trauma-informed GP, psychologist or psychiatrist evidence and physical examination records only where relevant and chosen by the worker. A diagnosis alone may not answer causation or capacity: the records should explain the work event, symptoms, treatment and practical restrictions.
- Diagnosis, functional effect and capacity restrictions.
- Treatment and return-to-work planning that protects privacy and safety.
Which psychological-injury pathway applies?
The pathway depends on the event, the injury being claimed, when it was first notified, and the insurer’s stated reasons. Violence, traumatic witnessing and vicarious trauma generally follow the standard pathway after 1 July 2026; bullying, sexual or racial harassment and excessive work demands may engage the relevant-conduct pathway. Section 11A must be considered only where its requirements are actually raised by the facts.
- 1
Separate each alleged act. Sexual harassment is relevant conduct for a primary psychological injury first notified on or after 1 July 2026; sexual assault may instead be an act of violence or indictable criminal conduct using the standard primary-psychological-injury claim pathway.
- 2
Either pathway still requires a diagnosed mental or psychiatric disorder, a real and direct connection between the relevant event and employment, and employment as the main contributing factor.
- 3
A relevant-conduct claim requires a completed claim form and minimum supporting information. If liability is disputed, insurer internal review is mandatory before an IRC or PIC application; the IRC decides only whether the conduct was relevant conduct.
- 4
Where the dispute concerns assault, violence, indictable conduct or another ground rather than whether harassment was relevant conduct, the dispute ordinarily belongs in the PIC rather than being forced through the IRC conduct pathway.
- 5
Physical injury, primary psychological injury and any secondary psychological condition require separate medical and causation analysis; a criminal or workplace investigation does not itself decide the workers compensation claim.
- 6
The post-1 July 2026 psychological-injury rules described here do not apply to exempt workers (police officers, paramedics and firefighters), coal miners, volunteers, dust-disease claims, primary psychological injuries notified before 1 July 2026, or secondary psychological injuries. Those matters require the earlier or otherwise applicable rules to be identified before advice is given.
Common insurer disputes
After a sexual assault or harassment at work, an insurer may dispute the conduct is denied or characterised as consensual or harmless and the insurer disputes work connection at travel or social events. The written decision should be answered with evidence directed to those stated reasons.
Relevant conduct, violence and criminal-conduct pathways are conflated.
Section 11A is raised despite the alleged conduct not being management action.
Treatment, rehabilitation, and surgery issues
Trauma-informed GP, psychologist or psychiatrist evidence. Physical examination records only where relevant and chosen by the worker. If treatment is disputed after a sexual assault or harassment at work, the request should explain the accepted diagnosis, expected functional benefit and reasonable alternatives.
Diagnosis, functional effect and capacity restrictions.
Treatment and return-to-work planning that protects privacy and safety.
Treatment may include physical care, psychology, psychiatry, medication review or rehabilitation depending on the diagnosed injury. Approval depends on causation, reasonable necessity and the insurer decision; it is not automatic.
Weekly payments and work capacity
Work capacity after a sexual assault or harassment at work may turn on safe separation, reporting line, location and communications and privacy, contact with the alleged person and workplace investigation exposure. Proposed duties must be compared with the real task demands and the worker's ability to sustain them for the proposed hours.
Hours, concentration, sleep and treatment needs.
Permanent impairment and lump sum issues
A lasting physical injury is assessed under the NSW method for the affected body system only after the condition is sufficiently stable. The event label does not predict a WPI percentage. Primary psychological impairment is assessed separately under the NSW psychiatric impairment method when the condition is permanent and the legal pathway is established. Diagnosis alone does not determine WPI. Any WPI assessment after a sexual assault or harassment at work occurs after stabilisation under the NSW method for the accepted body system; the accident or surgery alone does not determine a percentage.
Secondary psychological impairment is not assessed for WPI in NSW workers compensation. Physical and primary psychological impairment are also not combined for section 66 compensation.
From 1 July 2026, most workers generally have one principal permanent impairment assessment per injury, subject to limited further-assessment rules. Independent advice should be obtained before an assessment.
Primary and secondary psychological injury
A primary psychological injury is the psychological condition said to arise directly from workplace events. For claims first notified on or after 1 July 2026, the event must fit a relevant-event category and satisfy the additional connection and causation requirements. A secondary psychological injury arises as a consequence of a physical injury, for example depression associated with pain, surgery or loss of mobility after an assault injury. The 2026 primary-injury reforms do not apply to secondary psychological injuries in the same way. The distinction depends on medical causation and the accepted injury history, not simply on which symptoms were noticed first.
NSW permanent impairment law assesses primary psychological impairment separately from physical impairment. Secondary psychological impairment is not assessed for WPI, and the physical and primary psychological percentages are not combined for section 66 compensation.
On this page, the practical distinction depends on whether the psychological condition followed unwelcome sexual advance, request or other unwelcome sexual conduct directly, or developed because of a physical injury and its consequences. Medical evidence should address that distinction rather than assume it from timing alone.
Other claim pathways that may need investigation
A police, SafeWork, workplace, discrimination, Fair Work or protective-order process may exist alongside workers compensation. Those processes have different purposes and do not decide workers compensation automatically. A civil, victims-support or other claim may require separate advice depending on the person involved and circumstances. It should not be described as part of workers compensation without checking eligibility. These issues are separate from workers compensation and depend on the particular facts.
If an internal review continues to dispute whether alleged bullying, sexual or racial harassment or excessive work demands were relevant conduct, the IRC certificate pathway may need to be considered before the remaining PIC dispute.
Hypothetical example
Illustration: conduct across work messages and an event
Facts
A worker receives repeated unwelcome sexual messages from a supervisor and later alleges an assault at an employer-arranged event.
Questions to investigate
- separate sexual harassment, alleged violence and any criminal report
- preserve messages and event records without circulating them unnecessarily
- identify which claim pathway applies to each alleged relevant event
Why the result cannot be assumed
This is a hypothetical illustration of the evidence questions, not a prediction of liability, funding, compensation or outcome. Small factual changes can alter the legal analysis.
How NSW Work Injury Claim can help
For a sexual assault or harassment at work, assistance may involve identify the event category, incident date and claim pathway before responding to an insurer and organise incident, safety, medical, psychological and capacity evidence without circulating unnecessary private material. The purpose is to identify the disputed decision and the evidence needed for the next step, not to promise an outcome.
Review weekly-payment, treatment, work-capacity, section 11A and permanent-impairment issues on their own evidence.
Prepare a clear chronology and identify the next practical review or dispute step.
Common questions about sexual assault or harassment at work claims
Do sexual assault and sexual harassment use the same workers compensation pathway?
Not necessarily. After 1 July 2026, sexual harassment is relevant conduct. Sexual assault may be an act of violence or indictable criminal conduct. The alleged acts and the insurer’s reasons should be separated before choosing the dispute pathway.
Does a police report decide the workers compensation claim?
No. A police report can be important evidence, but workers compensation still requires the statutory employment connection, diagnosis and causation tests. The criminal and compensation processes have different purposes.
When may the IRC be involved?
For a completed relevant-conduct claim, insurer internal review is mandatory. If the review still disputes whether alleged sexual harassment was relevant conduct, the IRC may decide that classification only. Other liability issues remain for the insurer or PIC.
What if the insurer relies on section 11A?
Section 11A concerns specified management action. Sexual assault or harassment should not be relabelled as management action without identifying the actual action. The amended test also requires reasonable action in a reasonable manner to be a significant cause of the injury.
What evidence should be preserved?
Preserve messages, emails, access and CCTV records, event or travel records, confidential complaints, contemporaneous disclosures, witness details and medical records. Avoid circulating private material beyond what is necessary.
Can both physical and psychological injuries be claimed?
They may both require investigation, but each diagnosis and causal connection needs evidence. Current entitlement and permanent-impairment rules may treat physical and primary psychological injuries differently, so no combined outcome should be assumed.
Need help after a NSW workplace accident?
If you have an insurer decision, unclear capacity certificate or treatment dispute after a workplace accident, we can help identify the issue and organise the evidence. Where ILARS funding is approved, eligible legal costs and necessary disbursements may be covered.
Related injury guides
Related accident mechanisms
Later or multiple conditions after the incident
Related NSW workers compensation guides
Official sources
- SIRA: psychological injury claims for workers and employers
- SIRA: current psychological injury guidance for insurers
- SIRA: workers compensation reforms for injured workers from 1 July 2026
- SafeWork NSW: work-related violence
- Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), including section 11A and Part 3
- NSW Industrial Relations Commission: workplace conduct proceedings
- SIRA: meaning of witnessing for NSW workers compensation
- SafeWork NSW: exposure to traumatic events
- SIRA: NSW workers compensation permanent impairment guidelines
- SafeWork NSW: sexual harassment at work
Last reviewed: 19 July 2026
